Devotional Sharing, Submitted by Margaret Chen, Gracepoint Austin
Jesus is notably silent about what would happen after the man washed in the pool. What is the blind man’s response to Jesus’ command to “Go, wash?”
The blind man responds by doing exactly what Jesus commands. Despite the doubts or disbelief he may have had, he journeys over to the pool and washes there.
How might the man have felt on his journey to the pool?
I imagine that a lot of doubts must have run through the man’s mind. The commentary states that the pool must have been a considerable walk from where the man encountered Jesus and would have called for exertion. Perhaps at many moments in his journey, the man felt tempted to just not waste the effort and go back home. Perhaps he at times felt cynical or foolish walking with mud in his eyes and resented Jesus for not healing him more quickly/simply. There must have been also a lot of anxiety and hope as well as he thought about how he might finally be cured from his blindness and be able to see things as others do.
What can I learn about obedience and blessing from the fact that this man obeyed despite his limited knowledge?
One thing I can learn about obedience and blessing from the fact that this man obeyed is that as you obey by nature you don’t know exactly what the outcome of your obedience might be. As the blind man made his way over to the pool, he didn’t know what would come out of it all. Jesus was silent about what would occur thereafter. That must have been so suspenseful for the man. Operating only under a limited knowledge of who Jesus was and why he should obey Him, the man went to the pool. But by taking that step, the blind man was healed and moreover, his faith in Jesus was made more firm and solid. To the extent that nobody could take away his testimony – not even the threats from the Pharisees to be thrown out of the synagogue. I have been thinking a lot about how I can increase in my personal convictions and faith this year. With 3 new church plants underway, I especially feel such a pressure to grow and build up my personal faith and confidence in God. In order to do this, I need to be obedient and willing to exert myself even though I don’t know what the outcome might be. Naturally, I’d rather play it safe and not do risky or new things that don’t seem like would work out at least according to my judgment. I’d rather stick to the normal pattern of things because it is at least predictable. This pre-disposes me to making decisions and living in a way that would stunt my faith from growing. Applying things to my context, I see how there are so many opportunities to trust and obey God in unconventional and therefore scary ways. In ways that would place me in a position where I have to be stretched, feel stressed, and go out on a limb not knowing exactly what the outcome would be. I think about how the UT campus is so big with so many unreached students still. Things are busy as it is, but how can I do more to reach a new set of students or just more students in general? I think one way I can obey in the way that this blind man obeyed this year is in ministry. Praying, thinking, and talking about new and unconventional things I can do to meet more students and not be satisfied with the routine pattern of ministry as it is right now. To be open and bold about trying new forms of outreach that will most likely require courage, risk, and effort. Fueled by his desperation to see, this blind man simply obeyed and experienced blessing as a result. Likewise, I see my “blindness” as my faith that needs to be strengthened, fed, and built up. I pray that this year, I can experience God’s power and ability to work and experience the blessings of obedience by taking bolder and riskier steps of faith in ministry this upcoming year.
Devotional Questions:
John 9:11-38
The Blind Man
“The expression ‘they had thrown him out’ refers to excommunication from the synagogue, isolating him from his family and friends and debarring him from employment.”[1]
“The term “Son of Man” was a Messianic title, and a term used of Christ to express his deity (see John 3:13; 5:27; 6:27; cf. Matt 26:63-64).”[2]
The Pharisees
John 9:39-41
“Jesus’ remark, ‘For judgment I have come into this world, so that the blind will see and those who see will become blind,’ makes him the pivot on which human destiny turns. The Pharisees, assuming that they could ‘see’ without his intervention, asked in resentment, ‘Are we blind too?’ Jesus’ reply indicated that if they had acknowledged blindness, they could be freed from sin; but if they asserted that they could see when they were really blind, there would be no remedy for them.”[3]
Additional Questions:
John 9:2-3
John 9:4-5
John 9:6-7
“The Pool of Siloam was located at the southern end of the city, probably a considerable distance from the place where the blind man was. The walk would call for some exertion. […] The trip the man made must have been a venture of faith. Jesus had not even told him that he would be healed but had merely commanded him to wash.”[4]
John 9:18
John 9:19-23
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Frank E. Gaebelein, Gen. Ed. Expositor’s Bible Commentary CD, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1992) notes for John 9:7.
Commentary:
vv. 1-7 “The man whom Jesus meets at the Feast of Tabernacles has been blind from birth (9:1). This leads his disciples to ask about the origin of his suffering (9:2). They assume there must be a connection between sin and suffering, so they probe who is responsible, the man or his parents. Jesus rejects this entire line of questioning (9:3).
“The ‘purpose clause’ of 9:3b (‘so that the work of God … ‘) can just as well be applied to 9:4, and no doubt it should. Such clauses (introduced by Gk. hina) may begin the main sentence rather than follow it. Of eleven uses of the Gk. all’ hina (‘but so that,’ 9:3b) in John, four of them precede their main sentence (1:31; 13:18; 14:31; 15:25). If 9:2 – 4 follows this pattern, we may translate it as follows: ‘ “Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus. “But so that the work of God might be displayed in his life, we must do the work of him who sent me while it is still day.” ’
“The purpose clause now explains that Jesus must work so that God’s work may be displayed in this man’s life. God had not made the man blind in order to show his glory; rather, God has sent Jesus to do works of healing in order to show his glory.”[1]
vv. 8-34 “Each of these scenes probes the identity of Jesus, and each betrays a deeper literary function. As the story progresses, Jesus is more closely revealed by name: He is ‘Jesus’ (9:10), then he is called a ‘prophet’ (9:17), then ‘the Christ’ (9:22), and finally, he is declared to be ‘from God’ (9:33). It is easy to see the Christological progression of each name as the story develops. While the Pharisees repudiate Jesus and his role, the discussion drives home his true identity.
“Nevertheless the interrogation ends with the healed man experiencing the very thing his parents feared: He is expelled from the synagogue.”[2]
vv. 35-41 “The story closes with Jesus’ return visit to the now-healed blind man. He has heard that as a result of the healing this man was expelled from the synagogue community. Jesus similarly ‘found’ the paralytic in chapter 5 following his healing on the Sabbath (5:14). But while the paralytic’s disobedience to Jesus in refusing to remain silent led to Jesus’ increased persecution, the blind man becomes a model of faith and goodness.
“The blind man thus becomes a model of every believer who embraces Jesus’ lordship and suffers persecution as a result (15:18 – 16:4).
“It is significant that John’s story moves quickly away from the sheer fact of Jesus’ miracle-working capacity to the identity of the One who heals. The man’s faith is not in the miracle-working ability of Jesus. This is only the springboard. His faith quickly connects with the true identity of who Jesus is. He is ‘the Lord,’ and he rightly ought to be worshiped.”[3]
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid.